journal evaluation

Research on the construction of academic journal evaluation system and related issues

学术期刊评价方法体系构建及相关问题研究

Research on Classification of Academic Journal Evaluation Indicators Based on Factor Analysis

基于因子分析的学术期刊评价指标分类研究

Study on the Evaluation Index System and Methods for Journal Evaluation

期刊评价指标体系及定量方法研究

Study on Rationality of the Statistical Source Adopted in Core Journal Evaluation System

核心期刊现行数据统计源合理性的讨论

Study on Relationship among Different Benefit Mainstays in Academic Journal Evaluation

学术期刊评价中不同利益主体关系研究

Scientific assessment Evaluation index Academic journal evaluation Citation analysis ;

科学评价；评价指标；期刊评价；引文分析；

American journal evaluation system is introduced in details and the comments are given .

详细介绍了美国学术期刊评价体系的构成，并对其评价体系进行了述评。

The Purpose and Aspects of Journal Evaluation and Selection

期刊评价与选择的目的和范围

Definition of Core Journals and Suggestions on Improvement of Core Journal Evaluation

关于核心期刊的定义及对完善核心期刊评价的建议

Research on the Application of Principal Component Analysis in Academic Journal Evaluation Contrary to Common Sense

学术期刊评价中主成分分析法应用悖论研究

Academic journal evaluation Data waving Data independence Indicator difficulty ratio weighting ;

期刊评价；数据波动；数据独立；指标难度赋权法；

Journal Evaluation Function of Scopus and the Empirical Study

Scopus数据库的期刊评价功能及其实证研究

As an edition theory , social sciences journal evaluation seeks its philosophical support .

社会科学学报评鉴作为一种编辑理论，它寻找着哲学上的支撑。

Analysis of Present Situation of Impact Factor and Cited-frequency of Medical and Pharmaceutical Journals and Their Effects on Journal Evaluation

医药卫生类期刊影响因子和总被引频次现状分析及其在期刊评价中的作用

Closeness centrality lacks of distinction , and requires more strict , so unsuitable for journal evaluation .

接近中心度（CC）由于其结果缺乏一定的区分性，而且要求较为严格，不适合用于期刊评价。

Although the journal evaluation index system featuring the adoption of citation data such as journal impact factor as its core is widely used , this system has long been the center of controversy .

以影响因子等引文数据为核心的期刊评价指标体系虽广为使用，但也备受争议。

Currently , Chinese journal evaluation is developing better in theories , with different emphasis on natural sciences and social sciences , with multi developing trend in practice . However , there are still some shortcomings .

目前，国内期刊评价理论发展较完善，评价对象在自然科学和社会科学期刊上各有侧重，评价实践也呈现出多元化的发展态势，但仍有一些不足或欠缺之处。

Comparing to the country , province and city evaluation at macro level , to the university and research institute at the middle level , journal evaluation and researcher evaluation belongs to evaluations at the micro level .

相对于对国家和省市的宏观层次评价，对大学和研究所的中观层次评价，期刊评价与对研究人员的评价一样，属于微观层次的评价。

The tools of the study include records of classroom teaching observation , records of interview , evaluation forms of investigation , case reflections , teaching assessment , teaching design , teaching journal , evaluation forms of professional development .

本研究工具主要包括：课堂观察记录、访谈记录、调查评价表、案例反思、教学总结、教学设计、教学日记、教师专业发展评价表。

Core Journal and Journal Evaluation

核心期刊与期刊评价刍议

Introduction to H-index and G-index for Journal Academic Impact Evaluation

H指数和G指数&期刊学术影响力评价的新指标

It introduces impact factors , electronic journals and journal rankings in journal evaluation .

认为期刊评价的首要目的是界定优秀期刊，介绍了期刊评价的重要因素影响因子，讨论了期刊评价的新领域电子期刊和期刊评价的直接结果期刊排名。

Development Strategies of Journal of Hebei University of Technology by Analyzing Journal Evaluation Indexes

通过期刊评价指标看《河北工业大学学报》发展对策